CPS SOCIAL WORKERS & GUARDIAN AD LITEMS ARE NOT IN FACT AND LAW. . . "DEPUTY PROSECUTORS" . . . AND ARE THEREFORE PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF RCW 2.48.180.

Part 3

(courtesy of Luis Ewing)


CPS SOCIAL WORKERS & GUARDIAN AD LITEMS ARE NOT IN FACT AND LAW. . . "DEPUTY PROSECUTORS" . . . AND ARE THEREFORE PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT A LICENSE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF RCW 2.48.180.

RCW 13.34.1040 is illegal and unconstitutional because it violates the . . . “SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE” . . . and reads:

“RCW 13.34.040 Petition to court to deal with dependent child — Application of federal Indian child welfare act.

(1) ANY PERSON may file with the clerk of the superior court a petition showing that there is within the county, or residing within the county, a dependent child and requesting that the superior court deal with such child as provided in this chapter. There shall be no fee for filing such petitions. . . .” And;

ANY PERSON CANNOT BE A PROSECUTOR!!!!

ANY PERSON CANNOT PRACTICE LAW!!!

ONLY A LICENSED ATTORNEY OR TRIBAL COURT LAWYER CAN PRACTICE LAW!!!!

RULE 9 LEGAL INTERNS SUPERCEDES RCW 13.34.040!!!

COURT RULES SUPERCEDE STATUTES!!!!

See also RCW 13.34.180 (1) which similarly reads:

“RCW 13.34.180 Order terminating parent and child relationship — Petition — Filing — Allegations (as amended by 2009 c 477).

*** CHANGE IN 2013 *** (SEE 1284-S.SL) ***

(1) A petition seeking termination of a parent and child relationship MAY BE FILED in juvenile court BY ANY PARTY to the dependency proceedings concerning that child. Such petition shall conform to the requirements of RCW 13.34.040, shall be served upon the parties as provided in RCW 13.34.070(8), and shall allege all of the following unless subsection (2) or (3) of this section applies: . . .”

RULE 9 LEGAL INTERNS SUPERCEDES RCW 13.34.040!!!

COURT RULES SUPERCEDE STATUTES!!!!

BOTH STATUTES . . . RCW 13.34.040 THE DEPENDENCY STATUTE . . . AND . . . RCW 13.34.180 (1) THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS STATUTE . . . ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE THEY ALLOW ANY PERSON WHO IS . . . NOT A PROSECUTOR . . . NOT A DEPUTY PROSECUTOR . . . NOT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR . . . TO BRING A CIVIL ACTION IN VIOLATION OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE!!!!

I remember that they had to pass a special law (APR 12) here in Washington State to allow Real Estate Agents to be Exempt from being charged with Unauthorized Law for preparing and submitting or filing Legal Documents and Legal Forms that affected peoples legal rights over chattel property such as Real Estate!!!!

WOW, IT IS NOW OBVIOUS THAT THE WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT CARES MORE ABOUT THEIR GREEDY WSBA BAR ATTORNEY MAFIA REACHING THEIR GREEDY HANDS AND STICKY FINGERS INTO EVERY REAL ESTATE DEAL AND GETTING TO STEAL REAL ESTATE AGENTS MONEY THAN THEY DO ABOUT UNQUALIFIED, UNTRAINED AND UNLICENSED CPS WORKERS PLAYING ATTORNEY AND SIGNING AND FILING FORGED AND PERJURED DOCUMENTS IN FURTHERANCE OF THEIR OVERALL FAMILY COURT CHILD STEALING RING CALLED THE CPS DIVISION OF DSHS THAT IS STEALING PEOPLES CHILDREN UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW!!!!

See, ADMISSION TO PRACTICE RULES RULE 12. LIMITED PRACTICE RULE FOR LIMITED PRACTICE OFFICERS at: 

http://www.courts.wa.gov/court_rules/?fa=court_rules.display&group=ga&set=APR&ruleid=gaapr12

Children are NOT Legal Forms and are NOT chattel property of the Corporate States!

If they can’t show us a special statute specifically authorizing or exempting those who work for CPS and Guardian Ad Litems from practicing law charges, we can nail all of them with charges of Unauthorized Practice of Law!!!!

BOTH STATUTES . . . RCW 13.34.040 THE DEPENDENCY STATUTE . . . AND . . . RCW 13.34.180 (1) THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS STATUTE . . . ARE ILLEGAL BECAUSE THEY ALLOW ANY PERSON TO PRACTICE LAW AND INSTITUTE A CIVIL ACTION IN BOTH THE FAMILY COURTS AND THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF THIS STATE THUS ALLOWING NON-LAWYERS WHO HAVE NO LEGAL TRAINING AND NO BUSINESS LICENSES TO REPRESENT THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF OUR CHILDREN IN OPEN COURT IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF RCW 2.48.180 THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW STATUTE!!!!

BOTH STATUTES RCW 13.34.040 THE DEPENDENCY STATUTE AND RCW 13.34.180 (1) THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS STATUTE ARE ILLEGAL BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO STANDARDS!!!!

Even . . . “THE STANDARDS” . . . for . . . “APR 9 LEGAL INTERNS” . . . clearly show that . . . A CPS SOCIAL WORKER . . . and . . . GUARDIAN AD LITEMS . . . cannot be admitted to Limited Practice unless that individual CPS SOCIAL WORKER . . . or individual . . .GUARDIAN AD LITEMS . . . is in fact and law a duly qualified . . . . “RULE 9 INTERN.”

RULE 9 LEGAL INTERN . . . . reads in part:

APR 9 LEGAL INTERN

(a) Admission to Limited Practice. Qualified law students, enrolled law clerks, and graduates of approved law schools may be admitted to the status of legal intern and be granted a limited license to engage in the practice of law only as provided in this rule. To qualify, an applicant must:

(1) Be a student duly enrolled and in good academic standing at an approved law school with legal studies completed amounting to not less than two-thirds of a prescribed 3-year course of study or five-eighths of a prescribed 4-year course of study, and have the written approval of the applicants law school dean or a person designated by such dean; or

(2) Be an enrolled law clerk in compliance with the provisions of rule 6 with not less than five-eighths of the prescribed 4-year course of study completed, and have the written approval of the tutor; or 

(3) Make the application before the expiration of 9 month following graduation from an approved law school, and submit satisfactory evidence thereof for the Bar Association; and

(4) Pay such fees as may be set by the Board of Governors with the approval of the Supreme Court; and

(5) Certify in writing under oath that the applicant has read, is familiar with, and will abide by, the Rules of Professional Conduct and this rule. . . .”

Even . . . “THE STANDARDS” . . . for . . . “APR 9 LEGAL INTERNS” . . . clearly show that neither . . . A CPS SOCIAL WORKER . . . or . . . A GUARDIAN AD LITEM . . . can be admitted to Limited Practice unless that individual . . . CPS SOCIAL WORKER . . . or individual . . . GUARDIAN AD LITEM . . . is in fact and law a duly . . . “QUALIFIED LAW STUDENT . . . ENROLLED LAW CLARK . . . AND . . . GRADUATE OF APPROVED LAW SCHOOLS . . . MAY BE ADMITTED A LIMITED LICENSE TO ENGAGE IN THE PRACTICE OF LAW ONLY AS PROVIDED IN THIS RULE!!!!

ALL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERALS IN WASHINGTON STATE ARE COMMITTING A FRAUD UPON THE COURT, SECOND DEGREE PERJURY, FIRST DEGREE FORGERY AND PRESENTING A FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN A OFFICIAL COURT RECORD WHEN THEY PLACE THEIR ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURE NEXT TO THE SIGNATURE ON ANY DEPENDENCY PETITION OR MOTION FOR TERMINATION OF YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS SIGNED BY . . . A CPS SOCIAL WORKER . . . OR . . . GUARDIAN AD LITEM . . . WHO IS NOT A DULY QUALIFIED RULE 9 INTERN!!!!

“. . . (1) The supervising lawyer or another lawyer from the same office shall direct, supervise and review all of the work of the legal intern and both shall assume personal professional responsibility for any work undertaken by the legal intern while under the lawyer's supervision. All pleadings, motions, briefs, and other documents prepared by the legal intern shall be reviewed by the supervising lawyer or a lawyer from the same office as the supervising lawyer. When a legal intern signs any correspondence or legal document, the interns signature shall be followed by the title "legal intern" and, if the document is prepared for presentation to a court or for filing with the clerk thereof, the document shall also be signed by the supervising lawyer or lawyer from the same office as the supervising lawyer. In any proceeding in which a legal intern appears before the court, the legal intern must advise the court of the interns status and the name of the interns supervising lawyer. . . .” And; 

It is undisputed that Rule 9 the Rule for Legal Interns provides in part . . . “[W]hen a legal intern signs any correspondence or legal document, the interns signature shall be followed by the title "legal intern" and, if the document is prepared for presentation to a court or for filing with the clerk thereof, the document shall also be signed by the supervising lawyer or lawyer from the same office as the supervising lawyer.”

ALL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERALS IN WASHINGTON STATE WHO PUT THEIR ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURE ON THE SAME DOCUMENT AS A CPS SOCIAL WORKER IS A CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATOR WHO IS COMMITTING A FRAUD UPON THE COURT LEADING ALL OF US CPS VICTIMS INTO BELIEVING THAT CPS SOCIAL WORKER IS A DULY QUALIFIED RULE 9 

INTERN WHO HAS IN FACT BEEN GRANTED A LIMITED LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW AND SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND MALFEASANCE OF OFFICE, MISFEASANCE OF OFFICE, PERJURY OF HIS OR HER OATH OF OFFICE AND UNETHICAL CONDUCT FOR RUNNING A LAW PRACTICE WITH A CPS SOCIAL WORKER WHO IS NOT AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW!

ALL JUDGES WHO ARE ATTORNEYS CAN BE DISBARRED FOR PUTTING THEIR ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURE ON ANY COURT ORDERS THAT HAS THE ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURE OF ANY CPS SOCIAL WORKER OR GUARDIAN AD LITEM WHO IS NOT AN ATTORNEY OR WHO IS NOT A RULE 9 LEGAL INTERN PURSUANT TO RCW 2.48.220 (5)(9).

WE CAN DISBAR THE JUDGES AND ONCE THEY ARE DISBARRED, THEY CAN’T BE A JUDGE ANYMORE!!!!

OH, I AM LOVING THIS!!!!

SOMEONE NEEDS TO TELL THE WASHINGTON STATE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW BOARD THAT THEY NEED TO CLEAN UP THEIR OWN HOUSE FIRST BEFORE THEY START LOOKING AT TRIBAL COURT LAWYER LUIS EWING!!!!

ALL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERALS IN WASHINGTON STATE WHO PLACE THEIR ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURE ON ANY DEPENDENCY PETITION OR MOTION FOR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS ARE VIOLATING RULE 5.4 & RULE 5.5 OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT!!!!

“RULE 5.4 PROFESSIONAL INDEPENDENCE OF A LAWYER

. . .

(5)(b) A LAWYER SHALL NOT FORM A PARTNERSHIP WITH A NONLAWYER IF ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE PARTNERSHIP CONSIST OF THE PRACTICE OF LAW.

(d) A lawyer shall not practice with or in the form of a professional corporation or association authorized to practice law for a profit, if:

(3) a nonlawyer has the right to direct or control the professional judgment of a lawyer.” And;

“RULE 5.5 UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW; MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW

(a) A LAWYER SHALL NOT practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction, or ASSIST ANOTHER IN DOING SO. . . .” And;

“RCW 18.130.180 Unprofessional conduct.

The following conduct, acts, or conditions constitute unprofessional conduct for any license holder under the jurisdiction of this chapter:

(1) The commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption relating to the practice of the person's profession, whether the act constitutes a crime or not. If the act constitutes a crime, conviction in a criminal proceeding is not a condition precedent to disciplinary action. Upon such a conviction, however, the judgment and sentence is conclusive evidence at the ensuing disciplinary hearing of the guilt of the license holder of the crime described in the indictment or information,

and of the person's violation of the statute on which it is based. For the purposes of this section, conviction includes all instances in which a plea of guilty or nolo contendere is the basis for the conviction and all proceedings in which the sentence has been deferred or suspended. Nothing in this section abrogates rights guaranteed under chapter 9.96A RCW;

2) Misrepresentation or concealment of a material fact in obtaining a license or in reinstatement thereof;

(3) All advertising which is false, fraudulent, or misleading;

. . . 

(10) AIDING OR ABETTING AN UNLICENSED PERSON TO PRACTICE WHEN A LICENSE IS REQUIRED;

. . . 

(13) Misrepresentation or fraud in any aspect of the conduct of the business or profession; . . .” And;

ALL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERALS WHO PLACE THEIR ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURE WITH ANY CPS SOCIAL WORKER OR GUARDIAN AD LITEM WHO IS NOT AN ATTORNEY OR DULY QUALIFIED RULE 9 INTERN CAN BE DISBARRED PURSUANT TO RCW 2.48.220 (5)(9) 

WHICH CLEARLY READS:

“RCW 2.48.220 Grounds of disbarment or suspension.

An attorney or counselor may be disbarred or suspended for any of the following causes arising after his or her admission to practice:

. . . 

(5) Lending his or her name to be used as attorney and counselor by another person who is not an attorney and counselor.

. . . 

(9) PRACTICING LAW WITH OR IN COOPERATION with a disbarred or suspended attorney, or maintaining an office for the practice of law in a room or office occupied or used in whole or in part by a disbarred or suspended attorney, or permitting a disbarred or suspended attorney to use his or her name for the practice of law, or practicing law for or on behalf of a disbarred or suspended attorney, or practicing law under any arrangement or understanding for division of fees or compensation of any kind with a disbarred or suspended attorney or WITH ANY PERSON NOT A LICENSED ATTORNEY. . . .” And; 

RCW 2.48.220 CLEARLY PROVIDES THAT . . . “AN ATTORNEY OR COUNSELOR MAY BE DISBARRED OR SUSPENDED FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CAUSES ARISING AFTER HIS OR HER ADMISSION TO PRACTICE . . . (9) PRACTICING LAW WITH OR IN COOPERATION . . . WITH ANY PERSON NOT A LICENSED ATTORNEY.”

ARE ANY OF THE CPS SOCIAL WORKERS . . . LICENSED ATTORNEY’S????

ARE ANY OF THE CPS GUARDIAN AD LITEMS . . . LICENSED ATTORNEYS????

IF NOT, WE CAN FILE A MOTION FOR ANY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

TO BE DISBARRED IF HE PLACED HIS ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURE ON ANY DOCUMENT WITH ANY CPS SOCIAL WORKER OR GUARDIAN AD LITEM WHO IS NOT IN FACT AN ATTORNEY OR DULY QUALIFIED RULE 9 INTERN!!!!

IF NOT, WE CAN FILE A MOTION FOR ANY JUDGE TO BE DISBARRED IF HE PLACES HIS ACCOMPANYING SIGNATURE ON ANY DEPENDENCY PETITION OR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PETITION WITH ANY CPS SOCIAL WORKER OR GUARDIAN AD LITEM WHO IS NOT IN FACT A LICENSED ATTORNEY OR DULY QUALIFIED RULE 9 LEGAL INTERN!!!!

DOES A . . . “CPS SOCIAL WORKER” . . . OR . . . “GUARDIAN AD LITEM” . . . EVEN HAVE . . . “A BUSINESS LICENSE” . . . TO BE WORKING IN THE COURT????

Neither 1 of the two statutes, RCW 13.34.040 or RCW 13.34.180 (1), provides any . . . 

"EXEMPTION" . . . to CPS Social Workers or Guardian Ad Litems from being charged with . . . "UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW."

CPS SOCIAL WORKERS . . . and . . . GUARDIAN AD LITEMS . . . have NO legal or statutory authority to . . . "REPRESENT ANY CHILDREN” . . . unless they are . . . “LICENSED ATTORNEYS.”

ALL CPS SOCIAL WORKERS AND GUARDIAN AD LITEMS ARE ALSO GUILTY OF VIOLATING RCW 9.62.020 AS THEY DO NOT HAVE MY PERMISSION TO INSTITUTE A SUIT ON BEHALF OF ME TO TAKE AWAY MY CHILDREN AND THEY CAN’T LEGALLY OBTAIN MY CHILDREN’S PERMISSION TO TAKE THEIR PARENTS AWAY BECAUSE THEY ARE MINORS AND NOT COMPETENT OR ABLE TO CONTRACT UNDER THE LAW!!!!

“RCW 9.62.020 Instituting suit in name of another.

Every person who shall institute or prosecute any action or other proceeding in the name of another, without his consent and contrary to law, shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

[1909 c 249 § 124; RRS § 2376.]” And;

THE STATE CANNOT CONSENT TO CPS SOCIAL WORKERS OR GUARDIAN AD LITEMS PRACTICING LAW WITHOUT VIOLATING THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW STATUTE RCW 2.48.180.

THEY BETTER SHOW US THE STATUTE OR THE STATUTES THAT SAYS THAT THOSE WHO WORK FOR CPS ARE EXEMPT FROM BEING CHARGED WITH VIOLATING RCW 2.48.180 THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW STATUTE . . . OR . . . WE CAN CHARGE ALL OF YOU AS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS . . . AND/OR . . . AS ACCESSORY’S AFTER THE FACT . . . OR . . . AIDERS AND ABETTERS . . . AND WITH . . . LEADING ORGANIZED CRIME.

I will be filing a formal complaint with the KITSAP COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE KITSAP COUNTY PROSECUTOR AND THE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION specifically requesting that they bring criminal charges against . . . ALL CPS SOCIAL WORKERS IN KITSAP COUNTY . . . for violating RCW 2.48.180, the UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW STATUTE.

And if the KITSAP COUNTY SHERIFF DOESN'T INVESTIGATE AS REQUIRED BY RCW 36.28.011, I can charge him with . . . OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT!

“RCW 36.28.011 Duty to make complaint. In addition to the duties contained in RCW 36.28.010, it shall be the duty of all sheriffs to make complaint of all violations of the criminal law, which shall come to their knowledge, within their respective jurisdictions.”

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=36.28.011

EVERYBODY NEEDS TO START FILING COMPLAINTS WITH THEIR LOCAL COUNTY SHERIFF AND DEMAND HE DO HIS DUTY AND MAKE COMPLAINTS AGAINST ALL CPS SOCIAL WORKERS AND GUARDIAN AD LITEMS IN HIS COUNTY THAT ARE PRACTICING LAW IN VIOLATION OF RCW 2.48.180 THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW STATUTE!!!!

EVERYONE NEEDS TO FILE FORMAL WRITTEN COMPLAINTS TO THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF EVERY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT AND DEMAND A FORMAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION OF ALL FAMILY COURTS AND SUPERIOR COURTS FOR ALLOWING  CPS SOCIAL WORKERS AND GUARDIAN AD LITEMS TO ENGAGE IN . . . “UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW.”

EVERYONE NEEDS TO FILE FORMAL WRITTEN COMPLAINTS WITH THE FBI ECONOMIC CRIME UNIT!!!!

EVERYONE NEEDS TO FILE FORMAL WRITTEN COMPLAINTS TO THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO INVESTIGATE ALL THESE CRIMINALLY CORRUPT STATE OFFICIALS FOR RICO VIOLATIONS!!!!

EVERYONE NEEDS TO BOYCOTT ALL THE STATE BAR ASSOCIATIONS!

EVERYONE NEEDS TO FIRE THEIR STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS!

BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THE ATTORNEYS ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOBS, THEY ARE NOT PROTECTING THE CHILDREN!!!!

IT IS MY OPINION THAT ALL FAMILY COURT ATTORNEYS WHETHER THEY ARE FOR HIRE ATTORNEYS OR PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE WORKING IN COLLUSION AND CONSPIRACY WITH THE ILLEGAL FAMILY COURT SYSTEM THAT ALLOWS ALL THESE CPS SOCIAL WORKERS AND GUARDIAN AD LITEMS TO PLAY ATTORNEY AND PRACTICE LAW IN OUR COURTS THAT OUR TAX DOLLARS PAY FOR!!!!

WHAT PROVES THAT ALL THE WSBA BAR CARD CARRYING ATTORNEYS ARE EITHER GROSSLY IGNORANT OF THE LAW AND THEREFORE INCOMPETENT OR THAT THEY ARE ALL CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS IS THE FACT THAT THEY ARE ALLOWING ALL THE CPS SOCIAL WORKERS AND GUARDIAN AD LITEMS TO COMMIT UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW IN THEIR PRESENCE!!!!

WHAT PROVES THAT ALL THE WSBA BAR CARD CARRYING ATTORNEYS ARE EITHER GROSSLY IGNORANT OF THE LAW AND THEREFORE INCOMPETENT OR THAT THEY ARE ALL CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS IS THE FACT THAT THEY ARE ALLOWING ALL THE CPS SOCIAL WORKERS AND GUARDIAN AD LITEMS TO SIGN AND FILED FORGED AND PERJURED DEPENDENCY PETITIONS AND TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PETITIONS TO STEAL AND SELL PEOPLES CHILDREN FOR MONEY!!!!

HOW COME NOT 1 IN 30,000 PLUS MEMBERS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION MEMBERS HAVE NOT COMPLAINED ABOUT CPS SOCIAL WORKERS AND GUARDIAN AD LITEMS PRACTICING LAW IN OUR COURT ROOMS????

HOW COME NOT 1 IN 30,000 PLUS MEMBERS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION MEMBERS HAVE NOT COMPLAINED ABOUT ALL THE DEPENDENCY PETITIONS AND TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PETITIONS AS BEING A FORGED AND PERJURED DOCUMENT AND ARE THEREFORE LEGALLY DEFECTIVE AND GRANTING THE COURT NO JURISDICTION TO PROCEED????

EITHER ALL THE WSBA ATTORNEYS ARE ALL IGNORANT OF THE LAW AND THEREFORE SHOULD BE DISBARRED AND PERMANENTLY PROHIBITED FROM EVER PRACTICING LAW EVER AGAIN????

OR:

ALL OF THE WSBA ATTORNEYS WHO PRACTICE LAW IN OUR FAMILY COURTS KNOW THAT ALL THE DEPENDENCY PETITIONS AND TERMINATION PETITIONS ARE FORGED AND PERJURED DOCUMENTS AND ARE THEREFORE CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS WHO ARE LEADING ORGANIZED CRIME OF COUNTLESS FELONY COUNTS OF KIDNAPING, CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE, CHILD STEALING, CHILD SELLING, HUMAN TRAFFICKING, EXTORTION, MONEY LAUNDERING, MAIL FRAUD AND VIOLATIONS OF THE HOBBS ACT????

IT’S TIME TO TAKE DOWN AND DESTROY ALL STATE BAR ASSOCIATIONS WITH A QUO WARRANTO!

YOU HAVE AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO MANAGE AND PLEAD YOUR OWN CAUSES AND DEFEND YOUR SELF IN PERSON!!!!

WHEN YOU ARE DEFENDING YOUR SELF, YOU ARE ACTING AS YOUR OWN ATTORNEY!!!!

WHEN YOU ARE DEFENDING YOURSELF AND ACTING AS YOUR OWN ATTORNEY, YOU HAVE THE ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO HIRE ANYONE TO BE YOUR . . . “PARA-LEGAL.”

HIRE ME TO DO THE RESEARCH TO TAKE DOWN AND DESTROY THE CPS DIVISION OF DSHS!!!!

HIRE ME TO BE YOUR PARA-LEGAL!!!!

I HOPE THIS HELPS EVERYONE FIGHTING CPS IN WASHINGTON STATE AND EVERY WHERE ELSE!!!!

Luis Ewing

c/o 34218 S.E. 22nd Way,

(City of) Washougal,

The State of Washington [98671]

If you want more information and/or want to see my list of testimonials, please send me an e-mail requesting that I add you to my e-mail list and please don’t forget to tell me what STATE you live in to Luis Ewing at: <rcwcodebuster@aol.com> or <rcwcodebuster@live.com> or <rcwcodebuster@mail.com> or <rcwcodebuster@yahoo.com> or <rcwcodebuster@gmail.com> or SKYPE me at: <luisewing> or you can call me Monday through Saturday, from 12:00 NOON through 10:00 PM on PACIFIC STANDARD TIME at my home office phone at: 1 - (360) 335-1322 or my cellular phone: 1 - (253) 226-3741

http://www.luisewing.com/flyers/index.html